True News 6: The Truth About Voting Part 2

June 26, 2010 - 10:31 pm 25 Comments

high res: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oGMEEE11Lc&fmt=18
Why begging politicians for pennies back on the dollar will never set you free – http://www.freedomainradio.com

Duration : 0:19:35


[youtube 1oGMEEE11Lc]

25 Responses to “True News 6: The Truth About Voting Part 2”

  1. DreadLaw2 Says:

    @fixrifex Indeed, …
    @fixrifex Indeed, it is absurd, but I didn’t bail the banks out. I was stolen from so that a violent monopoly that claims to be working in my name could give money to it’s friends. The fact that a bank charge is exorbitant is of no consequence when you have the option to not agree to the charge. But we should be free of the violence that leads to the bail-outs of course, down with the government!

  2. fixrifex Says:

    @SiaGrath as unfair …
    @SiaGrath as unfair as it is a contract is a contract. I learned my lesons well, after years of paying terrible charges on overdrafts and credit cards some financial discipline can only be good for your health. I will advise you focus on paying your debts and refrain from borrowing money you do not need. If you can’t afford it, avoid it.

  3. fixrifex Says:

    @DreadLaw2 so when …
    @DreadLaw2 so when you go overdrawn you get charged,but when the banks go overdrawn they get bailed out,by those they have been charging exorbitant amounts to. Wow I am sure we are all sympathetic to banks. Do unto others as……. does that ring a bell? I thought so.

  4. TVwakeup Says:

    You have a …
    You have a fantastic simple and precise way to explain things.

  5. natmanprime Says:

    Rather than getting …
    Rather than getting people to risk their lives standing up to an armed state and a brainwashed populace, wouldn’t it be better to encourage everyone to be as independent as possible, to the point where they don’t need money?
    Royalty don’t need it, and are sovereign unto themselves. Same should be
    for
    eveybody!

    Just allow folk at the bottom of the pyramid to raise their own living standards until everyone’s royalty
    (less bloodshed this way)

  6. TheNewTheory Says:

    Ron Paul 2012!

    I …
    Ron Paul 2012!

    I watched the previous video, and I don’t understand how you could get to a purely anarcho-capitalistic society unless you participate in government in order to destroy it. The freedom movement would have gotten this far or this big without Ron Paul’s participation in the 2008 election. I know that I would have never watched these videos without the Austrian School of economics and their predictions leading me to these libertarian ideals.

  7. DreadLaw2 Says:

    @N7a7v7i: Hey, just …
    @N7a7v7i: Hey, just out of interest, did you read the posts before my own? My points weren’t to the video, I was responding to a user, sorry for the confusion. Having a bank account has nothing todo with force… so my points were valid in that context.

  8. N7a7v7i Says:

    That’s bullshit. …
    That’s bullshit. Yes, the penalty was voluntary, but you must remember the point of the video. When your only true option is to either participate to get something back or walk away, most people will try to work with the system, even if it’s unfair. People don’t necessarily agree with a contract.

  9. DreadLaw2 Says:

    I didn’t say that …
    I didn’t say that it wasn’t “over the top”, I’ve said that you have no right to complain or say that the bank sodomized you. They didn’t, your penalty was entirely voluntary. If the contract says they can chop off your arms, then you shouldn’t sign it, if it says they can crucify your family then it isn’t a contract unless the individual members of your family all sign it too, you don’t own them.

    I am telling you to grow up yes. Stop pretending it forced upon you, when you agreed to the penalty

  10. SiaGrath Says:

    that’s the worst …
    that’s the worst argument I’ve ever heard in my life. so going on what you said, if a company said “if you go 5 dollars over, we will chop off your arms and crucify your family” in the contract, that wouldn’t be over the top just because they said it in the contract?
    quit sitting there insulting me dude. don’t you have anything better to do than troll people on youtube?
    and you told me to grow up. funny.

  11. DreadLaw2 Says:

    Why is it over the …
    Why is it over the top? You didn’t have to go overdrawn.. and I will bet you anything that the exact amount was determinable from your contract and related information.

    Your own laziness does not make them bad.

  12. SiaGrath Says:

    I know it was my …
    I know it was my fault but that’s still over the top.
    150 DOLLARS because I accidentally went a little over. Do you understand how much profit they’re making there?
    why do you run in here acting like a dick dude? chill the out.

  13. DreadLaw2 Says:

    @SiaGrath: That’s …
    @SiaGrath: That’s awful, I can’t believe your bank completely violated your contract with them like that. Fortunately, government interference or not, you can still take them to court for breach of contract.

    This is of course assuming they breached contract and you’re not just claiming banks sodomized you by acting directly in convention with the contract when you took money from them that wasn’t your own.

    Grow up.

  14. SiaGrath Says:

    here’s a perfect …
    here’s a perfect example.
    I bought a subway sandwich and some coffee on my work break. unfortunately I didn’t know that my account was at almost nothing, so it over drafted. I deposited my paycheck as per usual, and strangely enough a huge chunk of it was just..gone. turns out I payed about 150 dollars for that subway sandwich and coffee. 21X the original price. yaaaaaaay robbery! I’m just a teenager so I haven’t experienced anything TOO crazy, but already I’m getting sodomized by banks.

  15. DanMorin007 Says:

    Voting is giving …
    Voting is giving approval to a monopoly of violence (government) AND turning us against each other.

  16. henshinman Says:

    i want my pixies …
    i want my pixies and unicorns IT!!!!!!!

    [and yes i am kidding]

  17. henshinman Says:

    me to but how and …
    me to but how and really who to go after

  18. freedominsomalia Says:

    i gotta get me some …
    i gotta get me some of that stolen loot :P

  19. ambj219 Says:

    Yes again, and …
    Yes again, and thanks.

  20. ikemkrueger Says:

    18:14 If you point …
    18:14 If you point to the gun in the room, they shoot you with the gun in the room..

  21. ikemkrueger Says:

    12:48 THAT’S a …
    12:48 THAT’S a GOOD question my friend! :D

  22. MABUS01 Says:

    “Roman Saying:

    Let …
    “Roman Saying:

    Let them hate us, as long as they fear us.”

    and just look what happened to it…

  23. gosmokesome Says:

    No the war is an …
    No the war is an excuse to take the money from you. The money goes to other people.

  24. zonsb Says:

    The first creditor …
    The first creditor to the national debt is every person born in America. For every birth registered in America and Canada a bond worth a million dollars is created and floated on the market that becomes the collateral for which the US and Canada respective treasuries barrow against. The income tax pays the dividend to the bond holder which is the Federal Reserve.

  25. zonsb Says:

    Do I need to …
    Do I need to explain why in every election no ballot ever has a box wherein the voter can lodge their vote for none of the above?

    For a government predicated on using terrorism to coercer people to cooperate, a vote for none of the above is a contradiction to their terrorist premise.

    As if to say: “You mean as a voter I have before me a choice to opt out? That I can refuse consent to be governed and the government will leave me alone?”

Leave a Reply